
Does "innocent until proven guilty" exist? I mean, there's a legal term for it, but does it
really exist when faced with a possible "monster"?
Take for instance,
Personal Effects. In the movie, Ashton Kutcher's character's sister was raped, murdered and then partially burned for disposal. There really were no leads besides this man who was seen talking to her the night she was killed. While no true evidence or DNA tied him to her, Kutcher had turned him into her killer. Through his eyes he was never seen as innocent.
Does this happen regularly? Maybe you hear a news story, such as the one that sparked
Abortion and Feticide, and you jump to the alleged killer being guilty. You haven't heard any hard evidence, there's no confession, yet s/he's the one who did it.
There's always a bias. Be it an empathic connection to the one who's at lost or the burning need for justice to be met, but there is always some sort of sway. I guess it's just up to those within the court to keep those biases at a minimum and making sure it's purely the facts and evidence that make a person guilty.